Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (5TB)

From: Claus Guttesen <kometen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
Cc: Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (5TB)
Date: 2005-11-16 21:50:19
Message-ID: b41c75520511161350u3ed6f4b1x@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> at 5TB data, i'd vote that the application is disk I/O bound, and the
> difference in CPU speed at the level of dual opteron vs. dual-core
> opteron is not gonna be noticed.
>
> to maximize disk, try getting a dedicated high-end disk system like
> nstor or netapp file servers hooked up to fiber channel, then use a
> good high-end fiber channel controller like one from LSI.
>
> and go with FreeBSD amd64 port. It is *way* fast, especially the
> FreeBSD 6.0 disk system.

I'm (also) FreeBSD-biased but I'm not shure whether the 5 TB fs will
work so well if tools like fsck are needed. Gvinum could be one option
but I don't have any experience in that area.

regards
Claus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cristian Prieto 2005-11-16 22:56:42 PgPool and Postgresql sessions...
Previous Message Ron 2005-11-16 21:21:25 Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases