Re: [pgsql-www] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version?

From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version?
Date: 2007-06-07 23:24:09
Message-ID: b35603930706071624p1b774bbewbf81c7b64161210a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-www

On 6/8/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> You could certainly rework comments into changes to the main text and
> send them to the pgsql-docs list. If there are problems with the
> grammar, somebody will correct it. Or maybe they won't, but it doesn't
> matter, because the good thing is that the new text will be there. A
> piece of text with a minor grammatical error is better than no text at
> all.
Amen to that :} (at least if it's not completely misleading).

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Hunter 2007-06-08 11:56:33 Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-07 22:33:35 Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick TJ McPhee 2007-06-08 04:13:54 Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-06-07 22:59:06 Re: index vs. seq scan choice?