Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22

From: greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
To: dbdpg-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22
Date: 2003-04-08 14:03:43
Message-ID: b230f1d510e093a550159917bfbde289@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>> I am not sure about the malloc errors, but the "isn't numeric" errors
>> should be fixed by grabbing an updated version of DBD::Pg.

> This is DBD-Pg-1.22, do you mean newer than that?

Yes, sorry I was not clear. The latest CVS version should cleanly work
around the versioning problem. In particular, you should be able to
replace just the file "Pg.pm" to fix that problem:

http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/dbdpg/cvs/cvs.php/dbdpg

>> By the way, the latest stable version of perl is 5.8.0. You may want
>> to consider jumping to that as long as you are upgrading.

> The only thing is that I have heard suggestions that replacing the stock
> perl on OS X with 5.8 can cause problems with certain system functions

Forgot about the OS X factor. Nevermind. :) You want 5.6.1r2.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200304080959

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+ktaVvJuQZxSWSsgRAmfbAKCaBsg82LsLGry5HJ+iP0qUfJtcQACfcm4C
8q0kk3kTJEZgGVz16JzW+/Q=
=3Lw2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-04-08 20:20:42 Re: More protocol discussion: breaking down query processing
Previous Message Adam Witney 2003-04-08 13:55:33 Re: [Dbdpg-general] Re: Release of DBD-pg 1.22