| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bala M <krishna(dot)pgdba(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com>, chris+google(at)qwirx(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication) |
| Date: | 2025-11-06 18:23:15 |
| Message-ID: | b22b949d-0600-47d2-8695-1da83edc2c72@aklaver.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 11/6/25 09:04, Bala M wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian, Thank you for your response. Please find the requested
> details below:
>
> Since you have already started is that not already to late for this?
>
> Yes We are currently in the *testing phase* and validating with the
> above parameters. However, the replication process has been *extremely
> slow — it’s been running for the past 5 days* with limited progress.
1) Show how you have set up the publishers and subscribers.
2) Are you trying to replicate everything at once or a table or subset
of tables at a time?
3) How active is the source database?
>
> Any specific tuning recommendations or best practices to improve
> performance at this stage would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Krishna.
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bala M | 2025-11-07 00:30:27 | Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication) |
| Previous Message | Bala M | 2025-11-06 17:04:20 | Re: Index corruption issue after migration from RHEL 7 to RHEL 9 (PostgreSQL 11 streaming replication) |