From: | "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, 蔡梦娟(玊于) <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Queries that should be canceled will get stuck on secure_write function |
Date: | 2021-08-27 20:10:14 |
Message-ID: | b209a5d7-f7ef-4272-9fd2-111495f8bfc4@www.fastmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021, at 13:07, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 3:24 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > I wonder if we could improve the situation somewhat by using the non-blocking
> > pqcomm functions in a few select places. E.g. if elog.c's
> > send_message_to_frontend() sent its message via a new pq_endmessage_noblock()
> > (which'd use the existing pq_putmessage_noblock()) and used
> > pq_flush_if_writable() instead of pq_flush(), we'd a) not block sending to the
> > client before AbortCurrentTransaction(), b) able to queue further error
> > messages safely.
>
> pq_flush_if_writable() could succeed in sending only part of the data,
> so I don't see how this works.
All the data is buffered though, so I don't see that problem that causes?
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2021-08-27 20:16:40 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-08-27 20:07:02 | Re: Queries that should be canceled will get stuck on secure_write function |