Re: Interval for launching the table sync worker

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Interval for launching the table sync worker
Date: 2017-04-07 23:13:20
Message-ID: b12c468d-f6f7-b6b2-a07b-fb24e87e7c08@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/7/17 01:10, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> It's not critical but it could be problem. So I thought we should fix
> it before the PostgreSQL 10 release. If it's not appropriate as an
> open item I'll remove it.

You wrote that you "sent" a patch, but I don't see a patch anywhere.

I think a nonintrusive patch for this could be considered.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-04-07 23:16:34 Re: pgsql: Improve 64bit atomics support.
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-04-07 22:55:21 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Improve 64bit atomics support.