| From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-21 18:49:53 |
| Message-ID: | b117d0d71ca2a747c21239465f20f7505f798bb3.camel@gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Sat, 2025-04-19 at 14:03 +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> No libpq OAuth flows are available. (Try installing the libpq-oauth
> package.)
>
> People who have custom flows will likely know that they have to do
> anyway.
>
> Devrim: Does that match the package name you'd use?
On PGDG RPM world it would be libpq5-oauth -- but I need to read the
whole thread first as I don't know yet why we need to split out oauth
into a separate package (at least in the RPM world)
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor
BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-04-21 18:58:34 | Re: jsonapi: scary new warnings with LTO enabled |
| Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-04-21 18:46:01 | Re: jsonapi: scary new warnings with LTO enabled |