| From: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mitar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Feature: temporary materialized views |
| Date: | 2019-03-11 11:06:36 |
| Message-ID: | b0482cc0-242e-f070-ace2-2f9dc4ac4600@proxel.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/8/19 2:38 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:45:04AM +0200, David Steele wrote:
>> I think a new patch is required here so I have marked this Waiting on
>> Author. cfbot is certainly not happy and anyone trying to review is going
>> to have hard time trying to determine what to review.
>
> I would recommend to mark this patch as returned with feedback as we
> already know that we need to rethink a bit harder the way relations
> are created in CTAS, not to mention that the case of EXPLAIN CTAS IF
> NOT EXISTS is not correctly handled. This requires more than three of
> work which is what remains until the end of this CF, so v12 is not a
> sane target.
Agreed. Even if I could find the time to write a patch for this there is
no way it would make it into v12.
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Fan | 2019-03-11 11:43:15 | Re: I have some troubles to run test_shm_mq; |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2019-03-11 10:19:50 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |