| From: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Zhijie Hou <houzhijie22(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, shveta malik <shvetamalik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Avoid resetting subscription two_phase state to pending when already enabled |
| Date: | 2026-10-29 10:41:49 |
| Message-ID: | auMi7Q5LdFSYCeH8@bdtpg |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 03:52:46PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> There is the following documentation mentioning that slots must be
> created with the same parameters of the subscription at [1].
> When altering the slot_name, the failover and two_phase property
> values of the named slot may differ from the counterpart failover and
> two_phase parameters specified in the subscription. When creating the
> slot, ensure the slot properties failover and two_phase match their
> counterpart parameters of the subscription. Otherwise, the slot on the
> publisher may behave differently from what these subscription options
> say: for example, the slot on the publisher could either be synced to
> the standbys even when the subscription's failover option is disabled
> or could be disabled for sync even when the subscription's failover
> option is enabled.
>
> I'm not sure if this should be handled here as it is documented already.
I agree about the documentation, but the patch introduces a regression: without
the patch, two_phase is enabled on the replacement slot. With the patch, it remains
disabled.
It might be worth fixing, as preserving 'e' only when slot_name is unchanged
should be simple enough.
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2026-10-29 10:44:39 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2026-10-29 10:22:46 | Re: Avoid resetting subscription two_phase state to pending when already enabled |