Re: [PATCH] Fix argument in pg_indexam_progress_phasename()

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Markos Fountoulakis <markos(at)planetscale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix argument in pg_indexam_progress_phasename()
Date: 2026-10-22 04:10:27
Message-ID: atmMs0hl-i8QbG4w@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 22, 2026 at 08:31:19AM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> pg_indexam_progress_phasename(), which sits between these two
> layers, should also use int64. So the patch looks correct to me.

Yep, nice catch. This warrants a backpatch. Will fix, thanks for the
report.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2026-10-22 04:27:01 Re: [PG19] Promotion hangs behind a backend blocked on a stuck client
Previous Message Prashant Chinnam 2026-10-22 03:59:20 Re: [DEPARSE] Operators on ROW() constructors read back as row comparisons