Re: pg_dump/restore failure (dependency?) on BF serinus

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_dump/restore failure (dependency?) on BF serinus
Date: 2026-10-25 09:27:52
Message-ID: at3K2N2j96Ry1JNA@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2026-Oct-07, Kirill Reshke wrote:

> Thanks for taking a look, LGTM then? I can send thus diff as .patch file if
> you need one.

No need. I have pushed this to all branches, thanks for the bump.

> AI-generated isolation test is too specific, reproducing this exact issue,
> I don't think we need to include it. It doesn't provide usefull coverage
> much. If we decide to nevertheless have test here - tell me, I will remove
> AI bloat from spec. I didn't have much time to do a legwork here yet.

Yeah, I agree it'd likely be too specific and unlikely to provide useful
coverage. Did the test use an injection point?

Thanks

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-10-25 09:32:45 Re: tablecmds: Deadlock caused by Attach Partition
Previous Message ZizhuanLiu X-MAN 2026-10-25 08:55:11 Re: Optimize mergejoinscansel() by avoiding redundant computations