Re: Fix WITHOUT OVERLAPS PKs used for functional grouping

From: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix WITHOUT OVERLAPS PKs used for functional grouping
Date: 2026-10-13 16:00:17
Message-ID: asjohEcrHJvGeMWf@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2026-Oct-09, Andres Freund wrote:

> Without commenting about anything else, can you please not start separate
> threads for all these? Hackers is too busy to be able to keep up with
> everything, no need to make it even worse.

I'm not sure about this ... if we want these patches to have commitfest
entries (which sounds to me like they should, otherwise we tend to
forget them), I think it's better to have separate threads. This is
especially true if the proposed fixes are likely to spawn discussion.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Maybe there's lots of data loss but the records of data loss are also lost.
(Lincoln Yeoh)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-10-13 16:05:14 Re: [PATCH] pg_test_fsync: close Windows alarm thread handles
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2026-10-13 16:00:02 Re: pgsql: Don't trust NOT NULL on virtual generated columns of partitioned