Re: Fix reindexdb with parallel index-level conrurrent run

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix reindexdb with parallel index-level conrurrent run
Date: 2026-10-06 07:06:08
Message-ID: asSd4FLIbNt6LAxt@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 06, 2026 at 11:56:21AM +0500, Kirill Reshke wrote:
> I think we can indeed just drop support for parallel index-level
> concurrency index rebuild. PFA

WFM. If somebody is interested in this pattern (I suspect that's not
the case, maybe I'm wrong), then it could always happen later.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2026-10-06 07:08:00 Re: ERROR: too late to create a new PlaceHolderInfo
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2026-10-06 06:56:21 Re: Fix reindexdb with parallel index-level conrurrent run