Re: Fix reindexdb with parallel index-level conrurrent run

From:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:	Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: Fix reindexdb with parallel index-level conrurrent run
Date:	2026-10-06 03:36:11
Message-ID:	asRsq2PkOikJErPf@paquier.xyz
Views:	Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2026-10-02 17:03:39 from Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎  2026-10-03 01:48:37 from Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎  2026-10-05 02:52:23 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>   2026-10-05 19:42:21 from Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>    2026-10-06 03:36:11 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>     2026-10-06 06:56:21 from Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎      2026-10-06 07:06:08 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>      2026-10-06 12:19:17 from Manu <manuelreyesbravo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Fix reindexdb with parallel index-level conrurrent run at 2026-10-05 19:42:21 from Manu

Responses

• Re: Fix reindexdb with parallel index-level conrurrent run at 2026-10-06 06:56:21 from Kirill Reshke

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Vaibhav Dalvi	2026-10-06 04:19:48	Re: gist_trgm_ops '=' operator: planner picks it over btree, ~300x slower
Previous Message	Michael Paquier	2026-10-06 03:34:18	Re: Compression of bigger WAL records