Re: parallel autovacuum: Propagate track_cost_delay_timing to parallel workers

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>
Subject: Re: parallel autovacuum: Propagate track_cost_delay_timing to parallel workers
Date: 2026-10-05 06:25:05
Message-ID: asNCweqeTwVDm2XN@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 08:45:17AM -0700, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> Thanks. v3 path looks good to me.

Yeah, reading through v3, that's not cool. @Sawada-san, perhaps you
should look at that before v19 releases..
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2026-10-05 06:32:09 Re: Check for non-deterministic FK collations before upgrade
Previous Message Richard Guo 2026-10-05 06:21:19 Re: Assert failure in get_baserel_parampathinfo with lateral UNION ALL