Re: Report relation extension blockers within parallel lock groups

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Report relation extension blockers within parallel lock groups
Date: 2026-10-04 06:23:20
Message-ID: asHw2H0gVqPrXHUQ@bdtpg
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Shihao,

On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 10:47:03PM -0600, shihao zhong wrote:
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> > The description in the documentation is getting quite dense. This could
> be
> > a good opportunity to restructure it for readability.
>
> The attached 0002 goes on top of v1.
>
> It moves the prepared transaction sentence up and
> gives parallel query its own paragraph.

Thanks for the proposal!

Moving the prepared transaction sentence up and giving parallel query its own
paragraph make sense to me. That said, I think that the parallel query paragraph
could be made a bit shorter like in v2 attached.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Report-relation-extension-blockers-within-paralle.patch text/x-diff 4.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jian he 2026-10-04 06:47:09 Re: [PATCH] Add planner support function to two-argument regexp_like()
Previous Message Richard Guo 2026-10-04 06:14:30 Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560