Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h
Date: 2026-09-28 18:54:54
Message-ID: arq3_vD_TSGBhhtQ@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 04:03:30PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> I've committed v5-{0001,0002} and attached a rebased version of 0003.
> Besides fixing some small things discovered during LLM review, I decided to
> remove the restriction that only one of TAS or S_LOCK can be defined.
> Having both doesn't break anything; we just use the platform's S_LOCK in
> that case.

I've now committed 0003.

--
nathan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2026-09-28 18:48:08 Re: Fire create_upper_paths_hook for UPPERREL_PARTIAL_GROUP_AGG