Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: small cleanup for s_lock.h
Date: 2026-09-25 21:03:30
Message-ID: arbhohGoRM2Phzm4@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've committed v5-{0001,0002} and attached a rebased version of 0003.
Besides fixing some small things discovered during LLM review, I decided to
remove the restriction that only one of TAS or S_LOCK can be defined.
Having both doesn't break anything; we just use the platform's S_LOCK in
that case.

--
nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v6-0001-Better-express-platform-requirements-in-s_lock.h.patch text/plain 6.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matheus Alcantara 2026-09-25 21:25:24 Re: Several issues with postgres_fdw stats import
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2026-09-25 19:59:43 Re: Import Statistics in postgres_fdw before resorting to sampling.