On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 08:57:51AM +0100, Alexandre Felipe wrote:
> This was motivated by two rebases on the SLOPE patch [1] this week due to
> changes in parallel_schedule. Also I find much easier to parse the list
> using this syntax, if we stick with one test per line we get the benefit of
> counting tests by looking at the line numbers.
>
> I used a `goto` to keep the number of touched lines small, and facilitate
> your review.
I'd +1 something like that in the schedule files, even if we only
limit the number of tests per line to be up to 20.
+test:
+ boolean
+ char
+ name
At least, let's make the whitespace vs tab policy consistent. ;)
--
Michael