Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Date: 2026-09-15 03:00:55
Message-ID: aqi055hpoGbD5b4w@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 01:48:22PM -0700, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > Yes, I think you are correct. I can't always easily identify
> > logical-only changes. Patch applied, thanks.
>
> I found another place that we need to fix:
>
> Add CREATE/ALTER PUBLICATION setting retain_dead_tuples to retain
> information needed for conflict resolution (Zhijie Hou)
>
> The retain_dead_tuples is a subscription option but not a
> publication's one. Also, it's required for conflict detection. Please
> review the attached patch that does:
>
> s/publication/subscription/
> s/conflict resolution/conflict detection/

Yep, seems I have problems with logical-only changes, and in
publication/subscription details too. Thanks for the patch, applied.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2026-09-15 03:05:20 Re: Use-after-free of a shared Path in add_path()/add_partial_path()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2026-09-15 02:51:24 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes