Re: Reduce memory overheads for storing a Memoize tuple

From:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:	David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: Reduce memory overheads for storing a Memoize tuple
Date:	2026-08-22 22:34:15
Message-ID:	aooj57Gv-QX9tYrR@paquier.xyz
Views:	Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2026-08-01 08:35:06 from David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎  2026-08-03 04:52:01 from Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>   2026-08-05 05:23:30 from David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎    2026-08-05 06:28:24 from Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>     2026-08-21 02:55:23 from David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>      2026-08-21 07:20:12 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>       2026-08-21 15:30:03 from Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> 📎       2026-08-21 23:39:37 from David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>        2026-08-22 22:34:15 from Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• Re: Reduce memory overheads for storing a Memoize tuple at 2026-08-21 23:39:37 from David Rowley

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Peter Geoghegan	2026-08-22 23:59:13	Re: toast table corrupted by vacuum - missing chunk number 0 for toast value
Previous Message	Andrew Dunstan	2026-08-22 21:50:56	Re: add list of major features to the v19 release notes