Re: transactions

From: "Brett Elliott" <brett_elliott(dot)nospam(at)att(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: transactions
Date: 2002-10-17 03:30:29
Message-ID: aolavs$2svt$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The only thing I can think of is the inability to archive
and replay transactions but this is coming in 7.4.

"Andrew Sullivan" <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> wrote in message
news:20021016115346(dot)D8509(at)mail(dot)libertyrms(dot)com(dot)(dot)(dot)
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 10:06:38AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
>
> > Which reminds me, when Oracle was responding to the .org using
postgresql
> > issue they said that Postgresql doesn't support transactions. Did they
> > even bother looking at the docs for Postgresql before spewing their lame
> > crap??? Probably not.
>
> To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL
> lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise
> database". While that is presumably something beyond just
> "transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed
> actually to be. Anyone got any ideas?
>
> A
>
> --
> ----
> Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
> Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
> <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
> +1 416 646 3304 x110
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-17 03:36:01 Re: tuplestore: write failed
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2002-10-17 03:03:21 Re: Has anyone seen this SPARC bug? [Fwd: Bug#165060: postgresql: int8 value out of range on sparc]