Re: Fix GROUP BY ALL handling of ORDER BY operator semantics

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix GROUP BY ALL handling of ORDER BY operator semantics
Date: 2026-08-20 02:12:00
Message-ID: aoZicGVSdpdX2SQ-@momjian.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 05:59:10AM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 18, 2026, at 04:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> > I wrote:
> >> Thanks for doing that! I'll wait another day or so to see if anyone
> >> wants to push back on reverting this.
> >
> > Hearing nothing, pushed. Thanks for doing the legwork on that.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
>
> We need to notify Bruce to remove this feature from the PG19 release note. If that’s not done yet, I can do it.

Yes, I removed it in my July update, thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com

Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henson Choi 2026-08-20 02:35:08 Re: [PATCH] Fix quotation logic for unreserved keywords in window specifications
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-08-20 02:08:24 Re: Fix signed/unsigned integer handling in pg_restore_relation_stats()