Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions
Date: 2026-08-26 16:37:10
Message-ID: ao8WNnQXpGUykHLA@nathan
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

[RMT hat]

Unfortunately, since this feature still requires substantial changes and
there are remaining questions on its design, the RMT has decided to request
a revert for v19. Alexander, can you please do so within the next week? I
acknowledge that this is a frustrating outcome for those who worked hard on
it, but I hope the post-feature-freeze discussion has illuminated what
needs to happen for successful inclusion in v20.

--
nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2026-08-26 16:42:22 Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions
Previous Message Pierre Forstmann 2026-08-26 14:38:02 Re: BUG #19369: Not documented that io_uring on kernel versions between 5.1 and below 5.6 does not work

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2026-08-26 16:42:22 Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions
Previous Message Palak Chaturvedi 2026-08-26 16:36:11 Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart