| From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: add list of major features to the v19 release notes |
| Date: | 2026-08-25 14:30:18 |
| Message-ID: | ao2m-rfWTCtHhxCs@nathan |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 22, 2026 at 05:50:56PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> On 2026-08-22 Sa 3:56 PM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> This has been up for awhile, so I don't want to suggest removing items
>> for this list. That said, I'd like to suggest a few
>> listing/wording/ordering tweaks, primarily to tighten up a few of the
>> explanations and align with the style from previous release notes.
>
> I don't know how the ordering was arrived at. I think we should lead with
> blockbuster items. Everyone will have their own opinion, but in my mind the
> blockbuster items are REPACK and pg_plan_advice.
There wasn't a whole lot of science around the ordering. We did
intentionally put the catch-all performance item at the end, but that was
about the extent of conscious thought about it.
Jonathan's proposed changes seem fine to me at a glance. I'll let that
marinate on the lists a bit more before applying.
--
nathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-08-25 14:47:11 | Re: Allow aggressive VACUUM to freeze without a cleanup lock |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-08-25 14:28:13 | Re: Allow aggressive VACUUM to freeze without a cleanup lock |