Re: [PATCH] Harden recovery/t/051_effective_wal_level against WAL recycling

Hello Bryan,

On 2026-Aug-10, Bryan Green wrote:

> On 8/8/26 22:44, Bryan Green wrote:
>
> > In recovery/t/051_effective_wal_level.pl, standby3, standby4, and standby5
> > are all init_from_backup()'d from 'my_backup', taken near the top of the
> > test, and started much later, after the primary has produced and recycled a
> > lot of WAL.  Nothing keeps the WAL they need to reach consistency: no slot
> > covering it, no wal_keep_size, no archive.
>
> I have a use case that is not stock PG that this is related to. I'm
> withdrawing this.

You have a use case for ... this test remaining borderline broken? I'm
wondering if you wanted to reply to some other thread.

Thanks

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La vida es para el que se aventura"