| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding comments to extension objects |
| Date: | 2026-08-08 23:48:33 |
| Message-ID: | anfAUYQ6iFj5MLvN@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Aug 8, 2026 at 06:12:40PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> So, if your extension creates a Foreign Data Wrapper, as several of mine do,
> there's really nothing for you to do. By all means comment on it, but it is
> very unlikely to help an MCP server. On the other hand, if it creates functions
> and types, commenting on those is probably a good idea, and if it creates
> tables it's a very good idea.
>
> I also asked claude for a template. It gave me one with a worked example. It's
> attached.
Great idea to use Claude. Also, we should consider cases where it will
help users but not necessarily MCP. FYI, pgvector already completed my
request:
https://github.com/pgvector/pgvector/issues/1013
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bryan Green | 2026-08-09 02:59:57 | [PATCH] Avoid uninitialized-value error in poll_query_until timeout diagnostic |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2026-08-08 22:12:40 | Re: Adding comments to extension objects |