Re: Random 038_walsnd_shutdown_timeout.pl failure on goldfish

From: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: 'Daniel Gustafsson' <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Random 038_walsnd_shutdown_timeout.pl failure on goldfish
Date: 2026-08-08 13:11:26
Message-ID: ancq/r/HIyQisz+q@bdtpg
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Fri, Aug 07, 2026 at 10:03:27AM +0000, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> > Given that there is a backup involved, that seems like a reasonable fix.
>
> Thanks for the confirmation!
>
> Forgot to say: this test was added by a8f45de, must be backpatched for REL_19_STABLE.

FWIW, goldfish was slow at that time. It's now fixed, but +1 for the patch.

Regards,

--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2026-08-08 13:17:23 Adding comments to extension objects
Previous Message Nitin Motiani 2026-08-08 10:25:00 Re: Adding pg_dump flag for parallel export to pipes