| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | ZhangChi <798604270(at)qq(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19491: Segmentation fault triggered by IS NULL |
| Date: | 2026-08-04 09:29:29 |
| Message-ID: | anGwARIffUrihqrP@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2026-Aug-04, ZhangChi wrote:
> Thanks all for fixing this issue and making pg better. Since this
> issue can reliably crash the PostgreSQL server, I would like to ask
> whether it should be treated as a security vulnerability and whether
> it is eligible for CVE assignment.
Hello,
Server crashes ("denial of service") requiring an authenticated user are
not, by themselves, considered security vulnerabilities. See "What is a
Security Vulnerability in PostgreSQL?" here:
https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"People get annoyed when you try to debug them." (Larry Wall)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2026-08-04 09:48:32 | Re: BUG #19607: Bug 18: `pg_surgery` infinite loop in `heap_force_common` |
| Previous Message | Zexin Li | 2026-08-04 08:54:03 | Re: BUG #19598: pg_waldump: -s/-e accept out-of-range WAL locations and silently use the low 32 bits |