| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, Andrey Rachitskiy <pl0h0yp1(at)gmail(dot)com>, malis(at)pgrust(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19586: money division overflow |
| Date: | 2026-07-30 06:26:11 |
| Message-ID: | amrug8sFJ6qsVAWx@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 07:10:32AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> A patch to -bugs is perfectly fine.
It is. There is no need to duplicate a discussion for a bug on
pgsql-hackers. We handle patches on both lists all the time. Some
may directly post a patch for a bug on pgsql-hackers rather than
beginning a thread on pgsql-bugs, which is also fine. Discussion
duplicates lead to a confusing result.
> What might help is a commitfest entry as a reminder. The message ID of
> a mail to -bugs will work just fine.
Exactly. That works just fine. We have plenty of these.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | 陈列行 | 2026-07-30 06:44:29 | Re: BUG #19572: Redundant predicate changes JIT decision and causes an 18x performance difference |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2026-07-30 05:10:32 | Re: BUG #19586: money division overflow |