On Sun, Aug 02, 2026 at 04:08:17PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> - newSize += XLOG_BLCKSZ - (newSize % XLOG_BLCKSZ);
> + Assert(reclength <= INT32_MAX - BLCKSZ);
> +
> + newSize = TYPEALIGN(XLOG_BLCKSZ, reclength);
>
> Am I reading a typo here or the INT32_MAX is missing a 'PG_U'?
> XLogRecordMaxSize cannot reach that, just wondering about a
> consistency argument with the surrounding type declarations for these
> length variables.
Another thing to note: this basically breaks the recovery test
039_end_of_wal.pl. Could you look at that please?
--
Michael