Re: rand48 replacement

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rand48 replacement
Date: 2021-09-25 14:44:52
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2109251643350.3216312@pseudo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello again,

>> Just wanted to let you know that cfbot [1] doesn't seem to be happy with
>> the patch. Apparently, some tests are falling. To be honest, I didn't
>> invest too much time into investigating this. Hopefully, it's not a big
>> deal.
>> [1]:
> Indeed. I wish that these results would be available from the cf interface.
> Attached a v11 which might improve things.

Not enough. Here is a v12 which might improve things further.


Attachment Content-Type Size
prng-12.patch text/x-diff 71.8 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-09-25 14:59:27 Re: BUG #16583: merge join on tables with different DB collation behind postgres_fdw fails
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-09-25 14:17:47 Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests