Re: Some code cleanup for pgbench and pg_verifybackup

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some code cleanup for pgbench and pg_verifybackup
Date: 2021-07-28 06:49:12
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2107280844590.1963471@pseudo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> [...] Thoughts?

For pgbench it is definitely ok to add the exit. For others the added
exits look reasonable, but I do not know them intimately enough to be sure
that it is the right thing to do in all cases.

> All that does not seem to enter into the category of things worth
> back-patching, except for pg_verifybackup.



In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yugo NAGATA 2021-07-28 07:15:11 Re: Fix around conn_duration in pgbench
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-07-28 06:28:03 Re: Remove client-log from SSL test .gitignore