Re: rand48 replacement

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Yura Sokolov <y(dot)sokolov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rand48 replacement
Date: 2021-07-03 15:36:02
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2107031729530.2359988@pseudo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> 1. PostgreSQL source uses `uint64` and `uint32`, but not
> `uint64_t`/`uint32_t`

Indeed you are right. Attached v6 does that as well.


Attachment Content-Type Size
prng-6.patch text/x-diff 47.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gilles Darold 2021-07-03 15:46:10 Re: [PATCH] Hooks at XactCommand level
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2021-07-03 15:26:00 Re: rand48 replacement