From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: seawasp failing, maybe in glibc allocator |
Date: | 2021-05-11 21:09:55 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2105112306480.965029@pseudo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Andres,p
>>> Unless perhaps the hard rlimit for -C is set? ulimit -c -H should show
>>> that.
>>
>> Possibly I have just added "ulimit -c unlimited" in the script, we should
>> see the effect on next round.
>
> If it's the hard limit that won't help, because the hard limit can only
> be increased by a privileged process.
It seems to be the soft one, so ISTM that it may work.
Before:
sh> ulimit -c -S
0
sh> ulimit -c -H
unlimited
Then after:
sh> ulimit -c unlimited
I have:
sh> ulimit -c -S
unlimited
sh> ulimit -c -H
unlimited
--
Fabien.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-05-11 21:11:29 | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-05-11 21:06:03 | Re: PG 14 release notes, first draft |