Re: pgsql: Add libpq pipeline mode support to pgbench

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add libpq pipeline mode support to pgbench
Date: 2021-03-17 09:17:01
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2103170856400.1011208@pseudo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers


Bonjour Daniel, Ola Alvaro,

> Add libpq pipeline mode support to pgbench
>
> New metacommands \startpipeline and \endpipeline allow the user to run
> queries in libpq pipeline mode.
>
> Author: Daniel Vérité <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
> Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b4e34135-2bd9-4b8a-94ca-27d760da26d7@manitou-mail.org

I did not notice that the libpq pipeline mode thread had a pgbench patch
attached, otherwise I would have looked at it.

Some minor post-commit comments:

For consistency with the existing \if … \endif, ISTM that it could have
been named \batch … \endbatch or \pipeline … \endpipeline?

ISTM that the constraint checks (nesting, no \[ag]set) could be added to
CheckConditional that could be renamed to CheckScript. That could allow to
simplify the checks in the command execution as mere Asserts.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-03-17 12:16:40 pgsql: Revert "Fix race in Parallel Hash Join batch cleanup."
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-03-17 09:07:40 pgsql: Fix comment in indexing.c

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhihong Yu 2021-03-17 09:19:23 Re: A new function to wait for the backend exit after termination
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-03-17 09:14:21 Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?