From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, "Wang, Shenhao" <wangsh(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench failed when -f option contains a char '@' |
Date: | 2020-12-20 13:43:01 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2012201436420.17354@pseudo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tom,
>> I think we should just leave this as it is. The user can simply rename
>> the file.
>
> Yeah. The assumption when we defined the script-weight syntax was that
> there's no particular reason to use "@" in a script file name, and
> I don't see why that's a bad assumption.
The "parser" looks for the last @ in the argument, so the simple
workaround is to append "@1".
I suggest the attached doc update, or anything in better English.
--
Fabien.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench-weight-doc-1.patch | text/x-diff | 684 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitry Markman | 2020-12-20 14:16:12 | how to find log |
Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2020-12-20 13:31:57 | Re: pgbench failed when -f option contains a char '@' |