Re: pgbench and timestamps (bounced)

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Soler <jaime(dot)soler(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pgbench and timestamps (bounced)
Date: 2020-11-26 23:08:26
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011262358470.3117595@pseudo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> CFM reminder.
>
> Hi, this entry is "Waiting on Author" and the thread was inactive for a
> while. I see this discussion still has some open questions. Are you
> going to continue working on it, or should I mark it as "returned with
> feedback" until a better time?

IMHO the proposed fix is reasonable and addresses the issue.

I have responded to Tom's remarks about it, and it is waiting for his
answer to my counter arguments. So ISTM that the patch is currently still
waiting for some feedback.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-11-26 23:20:28 Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-11-26 22:55:36 Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.