| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Recording test runtimes with the buildfarm |
| Date: | 2020-06-14 07:21:51 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2006140919310.473586@pseudo |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello Tom,
> I have in the past scraped the latter results and tried to make sense of
> them. They are *mighty* noisy, even when considering just one animal
> that I know to be running on a machine with little else to do. Maybe
> averaging across the whole buildfarm could reduce the noise level, but
> I'm not very hopeful.
I'd try with median instead of average, so that bad cases due to animal
overloading are ignored.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2020-06-14 07:23:49 | Re: problem with RETURNING and update row movement |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2020-06-14 07:15:37 | Re: extensible options syntax for replication parser? |