Re: moonjelly vs tsearch

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: moonjelly vs tsearch
Date: 2019-09-08 04:35:41
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1909080634230.15836@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> News from Fabien's bleeding edge compiler zoo: apparently GCC 10
>> 20190831 thinks the tsearch test should produce different output than
>> 20190824 did. It looks like the parsing of question marks change...
>
> Indeed, that looks pretty strange.
>
>> I can't wait for next week's installment.
>
> I'll relaunch gcc trunk compilation before the end of the week.

It did not do anything then, but this Saturday update fixed the issue.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-09-08 07:36:36 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Previous Message Rodrigo Ramírez Norambuena 2019-09-08 01:30:41 Re: [PATCH] Connection time for \conninfo