Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions
Date: 2019-08-27 06:59:18
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1908270857360.9896@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Bonjour Michaël,

>> The error returning stuff is simple enough, but I'm unclear about what to do
>> with pg_uint64, which has a totally different signature. Should it be
>> aligned?
>
> I am not sure what you mean with aligned here.

I meant same signature.

> If you mean consistent, getting into a state where we have all functions
> for all three sizes, signed and unsigned, would be nice.

Ok, I look into it.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2019-08-27 07:03:01 Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-08-27 06:59:11 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?