Re: chained transactions

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: chained transactions
Date: 2019-03-24 14:41:10
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1903241535220.9939@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hallo Peter,

>> In "xact.c", maybe I'd assign blockState in the else branch, instead of
>> overriding it?
> I think it was better the way it is, since logically the block state is
> first set, then set again after the new transaction starts.


>> About the static _SPI_{commit,rollback} functions: I'm fine with these
>> functions, but I'm not sure about their name. Maybe
>> _SPI_chainable_{commit,rollback} would be is clearer about their content?
> I kept it as is, to mirror the names of the SQL commands.

Hmmm. Function _SPI_commit does not implement just COMMIT, it implements

I'm fine with SPI_commit and SPI_commit_and_chain, and the rollback

Maybe _SPI_commit_chainable? Well, you do as you please.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-03-24 16:44:58 Re: jsonpath
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2019-03-24 14:34:33 Re: CPU costs of random_zipfian in pgbench