Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums
Date: 2019-03-21 09:57:41
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1903211047220.10347@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Anyway, as this stuff is very useful for upgrade scenarios
> a-la-pg_upgrade, for backup validation and as it does not produce false
> positives, I would really like to get something committed for v12 in its
> simplest form...

Fine with me, the detailed doc is not a showstopper and can be improved
later one.

> Are there any recommendations that people would like to add to the
> documentation?

For me, I just want at least a clear warning on potential risks.


In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Evgeniy Efimkin 2019-03-21 10:11:36 Re: Special role for subscriptions
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2019-03-21 07:17:32 Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums