Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option
Date: 2018-12-25 09:32:34
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1812251028460.32444@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Bonjour Michaël,

>> I do not see Michaël's issue [...]
>
> Sorry for the noise.

No big deal!

>> -- PostgreSQL database "foo" dump
>>
>> Or "pg_dumpall" could issue a comment line in the output telling which
>> database is being considered.
>
> Mentioning which database dump has been completed in the end comment
> could be additionally nice.

Indeed, it should be consistent.

Joyeuses fêtes !

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitar 2018-12-25 09:51:32 Feature: temporary materialized views
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2018-12-25 09:25:46 Re: Online verification of checksums