Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Buildfarm failures for hash indexes: buffer leaks
Date: 2018-10-22 08:12:28
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.21.1810221003590.3819@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Hello Michaël,

> The first failure is unrelated to the involved commits, as they touched
> completely different areas of the code:
> INSERT INTO hash_split_heap SELECT a/2 FROM generate_series(1, 25000) a;
> + WARNING: buffer refcount leak: [6481] (rel=base/16384/32349, blockNum=156, flags=0x93800000, refcount=1 1)
>
> And versions older than HEAD do not complain.
>
> Any thoughts?

Both animals use gcc experimental versions, which may rather underline a
new bug in gcc head rather than an existing issue in pg. Or not.

--
Fabien.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-10-22 08:12:54 Re: View to get all the extension control file details
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2018-10-22 07:16:47 Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take