Re: Re: pgbench randomness initialization

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: pgbench randomness initialization
Date: 2018-03-16 13:58:19
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.20.1803161457140.11977@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> But now the documentation is back to its original state of silence on
> what base or how many bases might be allowed. Could it just say
> "or an unsigned decimal integer value"? Then no one will wonder.

Done in the attached.

Thanks for the reviews.


Attachment Content-Type Size
pgbench-seed-10.patch text/plain 12.2 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-16 14:29:04 Re: "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" is not quite as silly as it appears
Previous Message David Steele 2018-03-16 13:44:31 Re: PATCH: Configurable file mode mask