Re: pgbench randomness initialization

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench randomness initialization
Date: 2018-03-21 15:29:18
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Patch isn't applyed cleanly anymore.

Fabien COELHO wrote:
>> But now the documentation is back to its original state of silence on
>> what base or how many bases might be allowed. Could it just say
>> "or an unsigned decimal integer value"? Then no one will wonder.
> Done in the attached.
> Thanks for the reviews.

Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-03-21 15:33:12 Re: WIP: a way forward on bootstrap data
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-03-21 15:07:57 Re: pgsql: Fix CommandCounterIncrement in partition-related DDL