Re: General purpose hashing func in pgbench

> I think it is not commitfest ready yet -- I need to add some
> documentation and tests first.

Yes, doc & test are missing.

From your figures, the murmur2 algorithm output looks way better. I'm
wondering whether it makes sense to provide a bad hash function if a
good/better one is available, unless the bad one actually appears in some
benchmark... So I would suggest to remove fnv1a.

One implementation put constants in defines, the other one uses "const
int". The practice in pgbench seems to use defines (eg
MIN_GAUSSIAN_PARAM...), so I would suggest to stick to this style.

I'm wondering whether "hash" should be a shorthand for one hash functions,
as a provided default chosen for its quality and efficiency.

--
Fabien.