| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion |
| Date: | 2017-08-27 06:13:15 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.20.1708270811060.18068@lancre |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Spending developer time to write code for the hypothetical someone running
>> a psql version 11 linked to a libpq < 7.4, if it can even link, does not
>> look like a very good investment... Anyway, here is required the update.
>
> The question is the server's version, not libpq.
Ok.
> Modern psql does still talk to ancient servers (I tried 11devel against
> 7.2 just now, to be sure).
Wow:-)
> The stuff in describe.c may not work well, but basic functionality
> is there and I don't want to break it.
Ok. Then the updated patch should work, although I do not have a setup to
test that easily.
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-08-27 06:34:05 | Re: More replication race conditions |
| Previous Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-08-27 06:09:22 | Re: pgbench: faster version of tpcb-like transaction |