Re: Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Debian "postgresql-common" config check issue with pg10

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pkg-postgresql-public(at)lists(dot)alioth(dot)debian(dot)org, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] Debian "postgresql-common" config check issue with pg10
Date: 2017-05-09 05:21:55
Message-ID: alpine.DEB.2.20.1705090718360.3983@lancre
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Hallo Christoph,

>> I've relaxed the regexps there. It's still not exactly what the PG
>> parser accepts, but I think it's a superset now, so we should be safe.

> Will it be released with the next pg10dev compilation?

The answer is "yes", and it works as expected.

Vielen Dank again for the fix!

--
Fabien.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-05-09 05:24:03 Re: SUBSCRIPTIONS and pg_upgrade
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-09 05:07:53 Re: logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION, query cancellations and slot handling)